Build a factual letter asking Immigration New Zealand to consider a character waiver, while keeping the criminal, immigration, or information issue fully disclosed and tied to supporting evidence.
Prepare the facts INZ needs to assess
Use the wording from your application, police records, court documents, and any INZ correspondence. Do not minimise, speculate, or add facts that cannot be supported.
Your character waiver support letter
The draft separates disclosure, current circumstances, the applicable waiver considerations, and the documents offered in support.
A New Zealand character waiver support letter should do more than ask for sympathy. It should identify the precise character concern, disclose the official outcome, explain the applicant's present circumstances, and connect each favourable statement to evidence. The decision remains discretionary, and the visa can only be granted if every other applicable requirement is also met.
A character waiver is considered within a visa application. It is not a separate visa category and it does not erase a conviction, previous information problem, or other character issue. The letter helps the immigration officer assess whether the surrounding circumstances justify waiving the relevant character requirement.
Confirm that a character waiver is the correct request
Immigration New Zealand distinguishes between people who may be considered for a character waiver and people who are legally ineligible for a visa or entry permission unless a special direction is granted. The distinction matters because a well-written character waiver letter cannot replace the correct statutory process.
Character waiver
This process may apply where the relevant residence or temporary-entry character instructions say the person will not be granted a visa unless a waiver is granted. Examples can include specified convictions, certain pending criminal matters for temporary applications, or false, misleading, or withheld information in an earlier application.
Special direction
This may be required for a person caught by sections 15 or 16 of the Immigration Act 2009, including certain long prison sentences, removal or deportation history, exclusion from another country, or security, public-order, and public-interest grounds. Special directions are exceptional and are not the same as an ordinary character waiver assessment.
Read the character wording in the visa correspondence and compare it with the current immigration instructions. Where the letter is unclear, the issue involves a serious custodial sentence, or there has been deportation or exclusion, professional New Zealand immigration advice may be important before submitting a response.
What the officer considers depends on the visa class
The supporting letter should not use a generic list of positive qualities. It should address the factors relevant to the application class and the type of character concern.
Temporary entry applications
- The reason for travelling to or remaining in New Zealand.
- The surrounding circumstances of the character issue and the application.
- The public interest.
- For false, misleading, or withheld information: its significance, the applicant's intention and involvement, and the diligence used to ensure accuracy.
Residence applications
- The seriousness and number of relevant offences or issues.
- How long ago the relevant event occurred.
- Immediate family lawfully and permanently in New Zealand.
- Other connections to New Zealand.
- Whether the applicant's potential contribution to New Zealand will be significant.
- Additional intention, involvement, and diligence factors where false or withheld information is involved.
Do not turn a factor into an unsupported conclusion. Instead of writing “I am rehabilitated,” identify completed sentencing conditions, the period without further offending, treatment or counselling, later compliance, and the documents that prove those facts.
Build the letter around a verifiable chronology
A coherent chronology allows the officer to compare the letter with police certificates, court records, previous applications, and INZ's own records. Dates and descriptions should remain consistent across every document.
A reliable sequence
- Identify the issue: state the offence, charge, investigation, or information concern without euphemisms.
- State the official outcome: give the conviction, sentence, fine, discharge, completed conditions, or current procedural status.
- Explain responsibility: distinguish explanation from excuse and address the applicant's actual involvement.
- Show later conduct: describe rehabilitation, compliance, and the time elapsed, supported by records.
- Connect the request to New Zealand: explain the visa purpose, family connections, other ties, contribution, or public-interest considerations relevant to the visa class.
- Map evidence to each statement: list the document that supports every important factual claim.
Evidence should answer the concern, not decorate the application
Reference letters can help, but they should come from people who know the relevant history and can provide concrete observations. A letter that merely describes the applicant as kind or trustworthy carries less weight than one that explains the writer's relationship, knowledge of the issue, length of observation, and examples of later conduct.
False, misleading, or withheld information needs a separate explanation
Where the character concern comes from an earlier application, it is not enough to say that an agent made the mistake. Current INZ instructions can apply even when an officer does not find that the applicant personally knew the information was false or intended to deceive INZ. The response should therefore address the significance of the information, the applicant's intention and involvement, and the steps taken to ensure that complete and accurate information was provided.
Useful corrective detail includes: what was inaccurate or omitted, how it entered the application, when the applicant discovered it, whether the applicant reviewed the form before submission, what was done immediately after discovery, and what verification process is being used for the current application.
Do not alter, recreate, or conceal the earlier record. A forged or unauthorised altered document is itself treated as false information under the character instructions, even where the substantive information in it is true.
Statements that weaken a character waiver request
- Blanket denial that contradicts official records. If a conviction, sentence, or prior submission is documented, address it directly.
- Minimising language. Calling an offence “minor” without explaining the sentence, harm, and later conduct can appear evasive.
- Blaming an agent without explaining personal diligence. The officer may consider what the applicant did to check the accuracy of the application.
- Unverified rehabilitation claims. Link each claim to dates, programmes, records, or credible third-party evidence.
- Generic New Zealand benefits. Explain the specific family, employment, study, visit, or contribution circumstances relevant to this application.
- Asking for approval as an entitlement. A waiver is discretionary, and the applicant must still meet every other visa requirement.
How to use the generated draft
After generating the letter, compare every date, outcome, and description with the police certificate, court material, earlier application, and the latest INZ correspondence. Replace broad claims with precise facts, delete any paragraph that is not relevant, and attach evidence in the same order that the letter discusses it. The final version should be signed and dated by the applicant unless INZ or the applicable submission channel requires a different format.
If INZ has sent a potentially prejudicial information letter or another request with a response date, follow the instructions and deadline in that communication. The generator does not calculate or extend a deadline, and a character waiver support letter should not be used as a substitute for a complete response to every concern raised.
Police certificates: INZ states that certificates generally need to be less than six months old when submitted and translated if they are not in English. The exact certificate requirement also depends on the visa and intended length of stay, so check the current visa instructions rather than relying only on a previous application.
Verify the current New Zealand instructions
The following Immigration New Zealand pages were reviewed on 31 July 2026. Check them again before filing because immigration instructions and website guidance can change.
- Character requirements for New Zealand visas
- Residence character waiver assessment — A5.25
- Temporary entry character waiver assessment — A5.45
- People who must not be granted a visa or entry permission — A5.20
- Police certificate requirements
- False, misleading, or withheld information in visa applications
Questions about the support letter
Does a strong support letter guarantee a character waiver?
No. Immigration New Zealand considers the individual circumstances and the applicable character instructions. A waiver is discretionary, and the applicant must also satisfy all other visa requirements.
Is a character waiver the same as a special direction?
No. A character waiver applies under specified immigration instructions, while a special direction may be needed where a person is legally ineligible under sections 15 or 16 of the Immigration Act 2009. The correct process depends on the exact history and the wording in the application correspondence.
Should an applicant disclose an old conviction that no longer appears relevant?
The applicant should answer the visa questions accurately and provide the records required by the current instructions. Police certificates must show criminal records as required by the issuing authority, and attempting to conceal a relevant matter can create an additional information or character problem.
Can the applicant blame a former immigration adviser for false information?
The applicant can explain the adviser's role and provide communications, but should also address personal involvement, whether the application was reviewed, and the reasonable steps taken to ensure accuracy. Simply attributing the issue to an adviser may not answer the factors INZ considers.


